Existential insecurity and deference to authority: the pandemic as a natural experiment

IntroductionThe global coronavirus pandemic offers a quasi-experimental setting for understanding the impact of sudden exposure to heightened existential risk upon both individual and societal values. MethodsWe examined the effect of the pandemic on political attitudes by comparing data from eight countries surveyed before and after the worldwide spread of COVID-19 in March 2020 with continuous weekly polling tracker data from the United Kingdom from 2019 to 2021. Multilevel models were used to explore the drivers of change, and the results indicated that reported emotions of fear and stress were positively associated with institutional approval during periods of greater pathogen risk. ResultsOur findings revealed that support for political and technocratic authority, as well as satisfaction with political institutions, rose significantly above long-term historical baselines during the pandemic. DiscussionThe results support the hypothesis that exposure to existential risk results in greater support for authority and that individual feelings of insecurity may be linked to less critical citizen orientations.

Managing hematological cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: an ESMO-EHA Interdisciplinary Expert Consensus.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has created enormous challenges for the clinical management of patients with hematological malignancies (HMs), raising questions about the optimal care of this patient group. METHODS: This consensus manuscript aims at discussing clinical evidence and providing expert advice on statements related to the management of HMs in the COVID-19 pandemic. For this purpose, an international consortium was established including a steering committee, which prepared six working packages addressing significant clinical questions from the COVID-19 diagnosis, treatment, and mitigation strategies to specific HMs management in the pandemic. During a virtual consensus meeting, including global experts and lead by the European Society for Medical Oncology and the European Hematology Association, statements were discussed and voted upon. When a consensus could not be reached, the panel revised statements to develop consensual clinical guidance. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The expert panel agreed on 33 statements, reflecting a consensus, which will guide clinical decision making for patients with hematological neoplasms during the COVID-19 pandemic.

ACUTE Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) and COVID-19 Infection. a Campus ALL Report

[Formula presented] Introduction. The recent spread of the COVID-19 infection has represented an important challenge in the management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients. Aims and methods. To investigate the incidence, features, source of contagion and outcome of patients with ALL who developed a COVID-19 infection, a survey was conducted among 34 hematology centers throughout Italy within the Campus ALL network. The period covered by the survey spanned from February 2020 to April 2021 and included 756 adult ALL patients actively followed during this time period. Results. Sixty-three of the 756 ALL patients (8.3%) developed a COVID-19 infection, with an equal distribution among the various regions. The majority of cases (90.5%) was recorded during the second wave of the pandemic, between September 2020 and April 2021. The source of the infection was nosocomial in 26 cases (41.3%), familial in 23 (36.5%), unknown in 13 (20.6%) and work-related in 1 (1.6%). The infected patients were prevalently male (n=43, 68.2%) with a similar distribution among age groups: 21 patients aged 18-35 years, 17 35-50, 15 50-65 and 10 older than 65. Seventeen patients (27%) had a diagnosis of T-ALL, 28 (44.4%) of Ph- B-ALL and 18 (28.6%) of Ph+ ALL. Thirty-six (57.1%) of the infected patients had no concomitant comorbidities, whereas 27 (42.9%) had one or more comorbidities. The infection was documented at the onset of the disease in 4 patients (6.3%), during induction in 10 (15.9%), consolidation in 13 (20.6%), chemotherapy maintenance in 11 (17.5%), after allogenic transplant in 15 (23.8%), during maintenance with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) treatment or off-treatment in 8 (12.7%) and at relapse in 2 (3.2%). Of the infected patients, 9 were asymptomatic, 10 had only isolated fever, 36 had respiratory symptoms and 8 presented other symptoms, including - but not limited to - ageusia and anosmia. As a consequence, management of the infection was variable: 29 (46%) patients did not require hospitalization, 28 (44.4%) were hospitalized in a COVID ward and 13 of them required respiratory assistance;finally, 6 (9.5%) patients were transferred to an ICU. Importantly, in 54 patients (85.7%) there were no sequelae, in 1 patient a pulmonary fibrosis was documented and in 1 patient the delay in treatment led to a relapse of the disease, while 7 (11.1%) succumbed to the infection. Finally, in 6 cases (9.5%) the infection was still ongoing at the time of the survey, and at the last update (July 2021) it had resolved in all. Since a key aspect in the management of ALL is the adherence to the timing of treatment, we also investigated if COVID-19+ patients stopped treatment during the infection. Out of the 42 evaluable patients (patients who had undergone an allogeneic transplant or were off-treatment were excluded from this analysis), ALL treatment was suspended in 28 (66.6%). Importantly, while in Ph+ ALL only very few patients stopped treatment (3/12), in Ph- B-ALL the majority did interrupt it (18/22, p<0.001);likewise, also in T-ALL most patients suspended treatment (7/8). Conclusions. The incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in adult ALL patients in Italy over a 15 month period has been similar to that observed in the general population and has been recorded mostly during the second wave of the pandemic. The contagion was mainly nosocomial, suggesting that outward care should be pursued as much as possible in ALL. The infection was manageable, with 46% of patients not requiring any medical intervention and an overall death rate of 11%. Strikingly, in line with previous reports 1, it appears that Ph+ ALL patients were more manageable, with less treatment interruptions. These findings underline the advantage of the TKI-based induction/consolidation strategy without systemic chemotherapy in Ph+ ALL used in the GIMEMA (Gruppo Italiano Malattie EMatologiche dell'Adulto) protocols and further point to a possible protective role of TKIs in COVID-19-infected patients. 1. Foà R et al, Br J Haematol. 2020;190(1):e3-e5 Disclosures: Chiarett : Incyte: Consultancy;novartis: Consultancy;pfizer: Consultancy;amgen: Consultancy. Bonifacio: Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria;Pfizer: Honoraria;Novartis: Honoraria;Amgen: Honoraria. Marco: Jazz: Consultancy;Insight,: Consultancy;Janssen: Consultancy. Curti: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Jazz Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Delia: Gilead: Consultancy;Amgen: Consultancy;abbvie: Consultancy;Jazz pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Forghieri: Jannsen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Novartis: Speakers Bureau;Jazz: Honoraria. Lussana: Amgen: Honoraria;Astellas Pharma: Honoraria;Pfizer: Honoraria;Incyte: Honoraria.

COVID-19 Infection in chronic myeloid leukemia after 1 year of the pandemic in Italy. A campus CML analysis

Background: An outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) started in December 2019 in the province of Hubei in China. Italy was one of the most affected countries with many cases diagnosed already in February 2020 and a lockdown was declared on March 9th. Limited information has been reported with regard to the impact of the pandemic on chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. Aims: To observe the temporal course of Covid-19 infection and the characteristics of positive patients. Methods: The Campus CML Italian group carried out a first survey on the management of CML patients during the lockdown. We launched a second survey during the pandemic phases 2 and 3, between May 2020 and January 2021. Results: We collected retrospective information on 8665 CML patients followed at 46 centers throughout the country. Within this cohort, we recorded 217 Covid-19-positive symptomatic patients (2.5%). Most patients (57%) were diagnosed as having Covid-19 infection between September 2020 and January 2021;30% were diagnosed in phase 1 (March-April 2020) and only 13% between May and August. Most of the positive patients were between 50 and 65 years (35%), while 26% had less than 50 years, 18.8% were between 65 and 75 years, and 11% had more than 75 years. A male prevalence was observed (73%). The median time from CML diagnosis to Covid-19 infection was 6 years (3 months-18 years). Fifty-six percent of patients presented concomitant comorbidities at the time of infection. When Covid-19 was diagnosed, 27% of patients were receiving imatinib, 26% nilotinib, 18% dasatinib, 8% ponatinib, 8% bosutinib, 2% asciminib, while 11% were not receive treatment. At the time of the infection, 74% of patients were in molecular remission, 6% in complete cytogenetic remission, 3% in partial cytogenetic remission, 6% in complete hematological response and 11% in treatment-free remission. At diagnosis, 28% of patients presented fever and respiratory symptoms, 13% cough, 10% isolated fever, 13% ageusia, 12% anosmia, 4% had more than 1 symptom, while 20% were completely asymptomatic. Twenty-one patients (9.6%) required hospitalization without the need of respiratory assistance, 18 (8.2%) were hospitalized for respiratory assistance, 8 (3.6%) were admitted to an ICU, while 150 patients (69%) were only quarantined. Twenty-three percent of patients discontinued TKI therapy during the infection. The source of contagion was familiar in 49% of patients, 18% due to work, 3% in healthcare professionals, whereas in 30% was not known. Twelve patients died due to Covid-19 infection with a mortality rate of 5.5% in the positive cohort and of 0.13% in the whole cohort. Five patients reported consequences post-infection: 1 patient reported a Guillan-Barrè syndrome, 1 patient a maculopapular rash, 1 patient a pulmonary fibrosis, 1 patient a bacterial endocarditis and 1 patient was diagnosed as having alterations of the microcirculation. Summary/Conclusion: This study reports the 1-year of data on the Covid- 19 infection in a specific hematological malignancy in the European country first hit by the pandemic. A longer follow-up is needed to further define the impact of Covid-19 infection sequelae in CML patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Front-Line Venetoclax and Rituximab (VenR) for the Treatment of Young Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and an Unfavorable Biologic Profile. Preliminary Results of the Gimema Study ‘Veritas‘

Fixed-duration treatment with venetoclax (Ven), a highly selective Bcl-2 inhibitor combined with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, showed high efficacy inducing high rates of deep responses with undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) in patients with previously treated and untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The efficacy and safety of the Ven and rituximab (VenR) combination have been investigated in a multicenter, prospective study of the GIMEMA group that included young patients with previously untreated CLL (LLC 1518, VERITAS, NCT03455517). The primary endpoint of this study was the CR rate assessed according to the iwCLL criteria. Inclusion criteria were: treatment requirement per iwCLL criteria, age ≤65 years, cumulative Illness rating scale score ≤6, creatinine clearance ≥30 mL/min, and an unfavorable biologic profile with IGHV unmutated and or TP53 disruption. Treatment consisted of the Ven dose ramp-up (from 20 to 400 mg daily, during 5-weeks) followed by Ven 400 mg daily, combined with R for six 28-day courses (375 mg/m2, course 1;500 mg/m2, courses 2-6). Patients continued with Ven single agent, 400 mg daily, until month 13. Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) prophylaxis measures included hydration, allopurinol, or rasburicase. All patients received Pneumocystis Jirovecii prophylaxis. G-CSF was given in patients with recurrent and severe granulocytopenia. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to the CTCAE criteria v.5, TLS events were classified according to Howard's criteria. Response was assessed at months 7 and 15 and included clinical examination, PB evaluation, BM aspirate, BM biopsy, and CT scan. MRD was checked centrally in the PB and BM by a 6/4-color flow-cytometry assay with a sensitivity of at least 10-4 according to the internationally standardized European Research Initiative on CLL. Quantitative MRD results assessed by flow-cytometry were categorized as uMRD (uMRD4;<10-4), intermediate MRD, or high MRD (≥10-2). MRD was further evaluated by allele-specific oligonucleotide PCR with a sensitivity up to 10-5 in the PB and BM of patients who showed uMRD4 by flow-cytometry. During the follow-up, MRD was monitored every 6 months. Between October 2018 and May 2020, 77 patients with CLL were included in this study. Two patients were off study before the start of treatment (withdrawal of consent, 1;Covid-19 infection, 1) and were not included in the analysis. The median age was 53.5 years (range 38-65). Binet stage B/C was present in 84% of patients, increased beta-2 microglobulin in 41%. Seventy-one (96%) of patients were IGHV unmutated, while 3 (4%) were IGHV mutated and showed TP53 mutation (Table 1). At the data cutoff of June 30, 2020, 65 (87%) patients completed the ramp-up phase. The planned 400 mg dose of Ven was reached within 5 weeks in 78.5% of patients. Response was assessed in 34 patients at the end of the VenR combination therapy. A response was achieved by 32 (94%) patients. Responses included 20 (59%) CRs, 1 CRi (3%) and 11 (32%) PRs due to residual enlarged nodes (median maximum size, 1.9 cm). Treatment failure due to toxicity was recorded in 2 (6%) patients. Overall, a response with uMRD4 by flow-cytometry in the PB was observed in 26 (76.5%) cases, and in the PB and BM, in 17 (50.0%). The rates of patients with CR and uMRD4 by flow-cytometry in the PB, and both in the PB and BM, were 44%, and 35%, respectively (Table 2). No detectable disease by PCR, both in the PB and BM, was observed in 4 (12%) patients. With a median follow-up of 4.5 months from the start of therapy, no patient has progressed or died. Fifty-three percent of patients were hospitalized during the first seven days of the Ven ramp-up phase. A transient laboratory TLS was observed in 3 patients. Treatment was discontinued after the first dose of Ven in 1 patient with evidence of laboratory TLS associated with severe neurologic toxicity due to the concomitant administration of fentanyl. Selected grade ≥3 AEs included neutropenia in 10 patients (ramp-up phase, 5) and neutropenic fever in 4. Gra e ≥3 infection was recorded in 3 patients and was the reason for treatment discontinuation in 1 who developed COVID-19 pneumonia. In conclusion, the preliminary results of this study demonstrate the high efficacy of the front-line VenR combination, which resulted in a high proportion of CRs and responses with uMRD4 in young patients with CLL and an unfavorable biologic profile. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Mauro: Astrazeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Jannsen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Octopharma: Consultancy. Reda: Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Trentin: Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;Shire: Honoraria;Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Coscia: Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding;Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Sportoletti: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Laurenti: Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Gaidano: Astrazeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Sunesys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Marasca: Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Shire: Honoraria;Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Murru: Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Rigolin: Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Scarfo: Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;AstraZeneca: Honoraria;Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Marchetti: Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisor committees;Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Levato: Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Galieni: Celgene: Honoraria;Takeda: Honoraria;AbbVie: Honoraria;Janssen: Honoraria. Liberati: Verastem: Research Funding;Onconova: Research Funding;Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding;Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding;Pfizer: Research Funding;Karyopharm: Research Funding;Morphosys: Research Funding;Novartis: Research Funding;GSK: Research Funding;Incyte: Honoraria;Oncopeptides: Research Funding;Takeda: Research Funding. Molica: Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Visentin: Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, SpeakersBureau;Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Vitale: Janssen: Honoraria. Del Giudice: Janssen: Other: grant for meeting participation;Tolero: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Roche: Other: grant for meeting partecipation;AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cuneo: Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Astra Zeneca: Honoraria;Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Foà: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Incyte: Speakers Bureau;Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Novartis: Speakers Bureau;Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Updated results of the fil “miro” study, a multicenter phase II trial combining local radiotherapy and MRD-driven immunotherapy in early-stage follicular lymphoma

Background: Early-stage follicular lymphoma (FL) is usually managed with involved field radiotherapy (IFRT), allowing a complete and long lasting eradication of the disease only in 40-50% of patients (pts). The aim of this multicenter phase II prospective study was to evaluate the role of MRD in identifying pts unlikely to be cured by IFRT, for whom an immunotherapy consolidation could improve outcome. Methods: 110 pts with stage I/II FL were enrolled and treated with 24 Gy IFRT. Peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) samples were centralized to the FIL (Fondazione Italiani Linfomi) MRD Network of EuroMRD-certified laboratories. In BCL2/IGH+ pts at baseline by both nested PCR (NEST) and RQ-PCR (RQ) in BM a/o PB, MRD was analyzed after IFRT and every 6 months over a 3-year period. Pts with MRD+ by both NEST and RQ in BM a/o PB after IFRT or who became MRD+ during the follow-up were treated with 8 weekly doses of the anti-CD20 MoAb ofatumumab (OFA). The primary objective of the study was to define the efficacy of immunotherapy in obtaining a negative MRD. Results: Of the 106 evaluable pts, 50 were males. Median age was 55 y (29-83). The FLIPI score was 0 in 59% of pts, 1 in 35%, 2 in 6%. 68% of pts had inguinal site involvement. At baseline, 30% of pts had a BCL2/IGH rearrangement (30 MBR, 1 MBR and mcr, 1 mcr) in BM a/ o PB;the concordance between compartments was 90%. All but one pt achieved a clinical response after IFRT;one additional pt died soon after IFRT of unrelated causes. MRD evaluation after IFRT revealed the persistence of BCL2/IGH+ cells in PB a/o BM in 60% of pts. MRD + pts, either after IFRT (n = 18) or in case of conversion to MRD+ during the follow-up (n = 6), received OFA, obtaining a conversion to MRD-in 22/24 pts (91.7%-CI 73.0-99.0), significantly superior to the expected 50% (Fig). After a median F-U of 38 m, 17 pts who achieved a MRD-with OFA are still negative;5 converted to MRD+ (2 received OFA retreatment, achieving a second MRD-;2 pts were not re-treated due to Sars-Cov2 pandemic;1 relapsed). A clinical relapse or progression was observed in 23 pts: 18 (24.6%) among the 73 “no marker” pts and 5 (15.6%) among the 32 BCL2/IGH+ at baseline (p = 0.3), with no significant difference in PFS (p = 0.25). Two early relapses were observed among the 12 pts who became MRD-after IFRT and 3 among the 24 treated at least once with OFA (1 MRD+, 1 MRD-, 1 converted from MRD-to MRD+). Only 1 Pt relapsed while MRD-after OFA. Conclusions: MRD data indicate that RT alone is often insufficient to eradicate the disease, inducing a MRD-only in 40% of pts, notably long-lasting only in half of them. The primary objective of this study-MRD conversion after immunotherapy-was largely achieved. The strategy of an immunotherapy consolidation after IFRT in MRD+ pts allowed increasing molecular responses. However, this strategy is applicable only to 30% of enrolled pts. A clinical advantage of the MRD driven treatment strategy is suggested although not significan.